>>9334
Anonymous are like namefags only without the delusion of internet self-importance.

>>9335
When you meet someone at a party and introduce yourself by name, is that "delusion of self-importance?" No. Believe it or not, it's how normal, socially functional human beings identify each other when they interact. Anonymous posting is only encouraged in places where the majority of people aren't worth knowing.

>>9337
image board aren't parties. Only socially dysfunctional people would make the comparison.

>>9338
When you meet someone anywhere and introduce yourself by name, is that "delusion of self-importance?" No. Believe it or not, it's how normal, socially functional human beings identify each other when they interact. Anonymous posting is only encouraged in places where the majority of people aren't worth knowing.

>>9339
>Anonymous posting is only encouraged in places where the majority of people aren't worth knowing.

The majority of people on this board aren't worth knowing. Or, for that matter, the internet.

You can compare it to actually meeting people in the real world all you want, but you just look retarded.

>>9340
That all depends where on the internet you hang out, I guess.

Anons are able to say something without a sign over their head saying PAY ATTENTION TO ME

Nobody is more important than anyone else. To think otherwise is just ego stroking.

END THREAD.

>>9339
>>9337
yeah, but we're not here to make friends
nobody will ever meet one another
we're here to discuss a particular topic
which in this case is which pony should pony pony

I would introduce myself to people that actually have a possible significance on my personal life
here, though, it's just a form of "hey, look at me and give my post a higher regard"
it's natural to attention-whore, but it's also natural to be a brute and to >rape

but, we evolved
and for these types of forums, we evolved passed having people develop internet personas and just go straight to direct posts, completely disregarding the actual poster's information and identity to bias the comment. we're just a collectivist of direct commentary

>>9458

Way to not comprehend what I was saying, tripfag!